1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Today Eb Reform Announcement

Discussion in 'General discussion about executive action' started by Satish.txt, May 4, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. s_gan

    s_gan Super Moderator

    Messages:
    5,306
    Likes Received:
    5,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are trying make sense of something that doesn't make any sense :)
     
  2. RealisticOptimist

    RealisticOptimist Member

    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    IV Admin says in latest post

    -----------------------------------

    "
    And in-between, as we shared earlier, we expect changes to the system whereby most (not all) the qualified pending applicants with approved Immigrant petition (I-140) will be able to file AOS (I-485).

    "

    ---------------------------------------

    this sounds like ppl with i140 approved for a certain time......

    so who knows what the cut off is

    that is not good at all IMO
     
  3. Rick D

    Rick D Active Member

    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    28
    There are only 2 'in-between' ways I can think of.
    1. Making VB temporarily C.
    2. Or recapture/reinterpretation.

    1 would affect everyone unless they were also counting ppl with approved I140 but who have changed jobs.
     
  4. ColumbusDude

    ColumbusDude Active Member

    Messages:
    456
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Well, hopefully this is a good lesson to ALL the IV stooges that troll this site and other Forums defending IV and its Big Boss. Consider the below:

    This was the first statement and if we take it at plain english face value, it meant that either re-capture or re-interpret or both, because that is the only way to fix GC Backlog.
    When the WH did not issue anything on Monday, they claim:

    If it is just a Report, what does technology have anything to do with a Report being released?
     
    GeorgeCostanza likes this.
  5. GeorgeCostanza

    GeorgeCostanza Guru

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    510
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Not really. Just stating my opinion.
     
  6. Rick D

    Rick D Active Member

    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Or we may be over-analyzing their statements and they themselves don't have the complete picture and details.
     
    ColumbusDude likes this.
  7. gcmatters

    gcmatters Guru

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well what I was trying to say is that candidates with approved I-140 is a straight forward case which can be addressed by memos .
    Also it doesn't require dates to move forward or to be current since and hence does not need additional recaptured visas.
    I do not see any other situation as simple and clear as above(approved I-140 with current employer) to be simply addressed by memos but then what do I know?
    I am just guessing like everyone else is here.
     
  8. s_gan

    s_gan Super Moderator

    Messages:
    5,306
    Likes Received:
    5,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Today IV is sounding more like roadside astrologer.
     
    binu2007 and Satish.txt like this.
  9. s_gan

    s_gan Super Moderator

    Messages:
    5,306
    Likes Received:
    5,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    exactly. IV is simply bluffing.
     
    binu2007 likes this.
  10. s_gan

    s_gan Super Moderator

    Messages:
    5,306
    Likes Received:
    5,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My comments was in response to IVs post.

    And IV put this too - "Also, it is expected that there could be potential lawsuits and/or legal challenges for every fix. So be prepared for all that, as these unexpected turn of events could happen more frequently as we enter into an uncharted territory of Administrative fixes, as there will be many forces that will come into play."
    :eek::( so we got to keep travailing..not sure how long.
     
    binu2007 likes this.
  11. gcmatters

    gcmatters Guru

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well in that case god help them!
     
  12. Senram

    Senram Member

    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    307
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Though Sessions is anti immigrant I like his dedication. With ver
    Technical issue may not be real reason. Either DHS might have told the technical issue but in reality that is different. Or IV might have come up with their own reason to fill the communication gap. Anyhow it will be confirmed in 2 months. Still you can trust IV if something comes before 2 months.

    My suspicion is

    1. How US DHS will leak the information with accuracy of date just to IV only. If that is the case then anti immigrants will become furious as they can complain that even small groups like IV can dictate terms to government
    2. Even if the leak is correct and the announcement is delayed how come IV could get answer in a few hours after close of Monday. Is DHS is accessible that much easily
     
  13. Satish.txt

    Satish.txt Member

    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    18
    +1 now they are not using any mystery words like, Ready, HeadUp, Keey paper ready, tomorrow blah..blah.
     
    binu2007 likes this.
  14. Satish.txt

    Satish.txt Member

    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Sounds like DHS/USCIS reporting to IV -

    USCIS - Sir (IV) we can't do this today can you please announce whatever reason to your clients.. o_O
     
    binu2007 likes this.
  15. gcmatters

    gcmatters Guru

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Whatever they write now, they better get it double/triple checked for accuracy and yes that includes their long damage control post on FB because people have already started analyzing that .
     
    binu2007 likes this.
  16. GeorgeCostanza

    GeorgeCostanza Guru

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    510
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Ah, I see what you mean.
     
  17. binu2007

    binu2007 Senior Member

    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Never believe this so called non-profit advocacy organization, who never publishes their tax information or balance sheet to their donors.
    The same thing happened on H.R. 3012 but they collected lot of money for the core member's vacation. Understand any Desi organization mostly all there is Fraud, and Felony. Never believe the words.. If Administration does what these people dicatate then what is the difference between zonia-macmohan government in India and the present government here.. Please think before supporting and especially donating hard earned money to them.
     
  18. binu2007

    binu2007 Senior Member

    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    28
    I heard the core members joined for bird astrology course at a road side place... pun intended.:)
     
    Satish.txt likes this.
  19. GeorgeCostanza

    GeorgeCostanza Guru

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    510
    Trophy Points:
    93
    This thread isn't going anywhere at this point. Not a lot of productive discussion is taking place. Wonder if it's time to close it?
     
    gten20 likes this.
  20. gcmatters

    gcmatters Guru

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    63
    In that case I have a question if experts can comment on and questions is :
    From below what is/are the changes/fixes that can partially/fully implemented via memorandum?

    1) AOS(EAD and AP) for approved I-140 ?
    2) Visa recapture ?
    3) None above and something else trivial?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page