The funny part is the people who had claimed "technical glitches" being the reason for the delay in release of the report are insisting VB movement as recently as an hour or two back. On what grounds, only they know and are not willing to share. "The revisions will help ensure that the maximum number of available visas is issued every year, while also minimizing the potential for visa retrogression." This only seems to imply that "moving forward" they will "try" to not waste visas. Since there is no mention of going back and recapturing those that are already wasted (possibly no legal standing to do so), there are no grounds to move the VB forward. Anyway Charlie had already mentioned that so they can always fall back saying he is the one who knows everything about that.