+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Provisions in Cases of Revocation of the Approved Form I-140

  1. #1
    Attorney at Law Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher has a reputation beyond repute Ron Gotcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1993
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Posts
    14,615
    Blog Entries
    31

    Default Provisions in Cases of Revocation of the Approved Form I-140

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security
    Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
    425 I Street NW
    Washington, DC 20536

    HQBCIS 70/6.2.8 - P

    AUG 4 2003

    MEMORANDUM FOR SERVICE CENTER DIRECTORS, BCIS, REGIONAL DIRECTORS, BCIS

    FROM: William R. Yates, Acting Associate Director for Operations, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security

    SUBJECT: Continuing Validity of Form I-140 Petition in accordance with Section 106(c) of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21) (AD03-16)

    . . .

    B. Provisions in Cases of Revocation of the Approved Form I-140

    As discussed above, if an alien is the beneficiary of an approved Form I-140 and is also the beneficiary of a Form I-485 that has been pending 180 days or longer, then the approved Form I-140 remains valid with respect to a new offer of employment under the flexibility provisions of §106(c) of AC21.

    Accordingly, if the employer withdraws the approved Form I-140 on or after the date that the Form I-485 has been pending 180 days, the approved Form I-140 shall remain valid under the provisions of §106(c) of AC21. It is expected that the alien will have submitted evidence to the office having jurisdiction over the pending Form I-485 that the new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupational classification as the offer of employment for which the petition was filed. Accordingly, if the underlying approved Form I-140 is withdrawn, and the alien has not submitted evidence of a new qualifying offer of employment, the adjudicating officer must issue a Notice of Intent to Deny the pending Form I-485. See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(16)(i). If the evidence of a new qualiflmg offer of employment submitted in response to the Notice of Intent to Deny is timely filed and it appears that the alien has a new offer of employment in the same or similar occupation, the BCIS may consider the approved Form I-140 to remain valid with respect to the new offer of employment and may continue regular processing of the Form I-485. If the applicant responds to the Notice of Intent to Deny, but has not established that the new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupation, the adjudicating officer may immediately deny the Form I-485. If the alien does not respond or fails to timely respond to the Notice of Intent to Deny, the adjudicating officer may immediately deny the Form I-485.

    If approval of the Form I-140 is revoked or the Form I-140 is withdrawn before the alien's Form I-485 has been pending 180 days, the approved Form I-140 is no longer valid with respect to a new offer of employment and the Form I-485 may be denied. If at any time the BCIS revokes approval of the Form I-140 based on fraud, the alien will not be eligible for the job flexibility provisions of §106(c) of AC21 and the adjudicating officer may, in his or her discretion, deny the attached Form I-485 immediately. In all cases an offer of employment must have been bona fide, and the employer must have had the intent, at the time the Form I-140 was approved, to employ the beneficiary upon adjustment. It should be noted that there is no requirement in statute or regulations that a beneficiary of a Form I-140 actually be in the underlying employment until permanent residence is authorized. Therefore, it is possible for an alien to qualify for the provisions of §106(c) of AC21 even if he or she has never been employed by the prior petitioning employer or the subsequent employer under section 204(j) of the Act.

    . . .

    [Emphasis added]
    Last edited by Ron Gotcher; 08-26-2008 at 09:22 AM.
    <a href=http://immigration-information.com/forums/images/signatures/jrgsig.gif target=_blank>http://immigration-information.com/f...res/jrgsig.gif</a>

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Form 9089
    By Kathrin in forum Working Nonimmigrant Visas
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-25-2009, 01:17 PM
  2. Specific CIS policy guidance on AC 21 I-140 portability
    By Ron Gotcher in forum AC 21 I-140 Portability
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-17-2008, 12:33 PM
  3. Basic CIS policy on I-140 portability
    By Ron Gotcher in forum AC 21 I-140 Portability
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-17-2008, 12:07 PM
  4. CIS Guidance on AC21 job transfers
    By Ron Gotcher in forum Adjustment of status
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-16-2008, 04:10 PM
  5. form 864-864A. W2 form related question
    By divyesh101 in forum Family based immigration
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-11-2006, 12:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts